In a stunning twist, the infamous “Sharpiegate” controversy has resurfaced, leading to the sudden dismissal of several senior officials at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
The decision has reignited debates over political interference in science, media ethics, and the lingering power of former President donaldtrump) on federal agencies.
What Sparked the Shake-Up?
Newly leaked internal memos, first reported by foxnews), suggest top NOAA staff were forced to publicly back Trump’s disputed 2019 claim that Hurricane Dorian threatened Alabama — even after their own forecasts showed otherwise.
Legal experts at columbia university) say the memos appear to document sustained pressure from White House aides.
Who Was Fired?
According to the Justice Department:
-
NOAA’s Deputy Administrator
-
The agency’s chief of communications
-
Two senior meteorologists
Sources say more resignations may follow as investigations widen.
Trump’s Reaction
On Truth Social, trump) defended the firings:
“They lied to the American people. Alabama WAS at risk. TOTAL exoneration!”
Critics argue this revives an old scandal to distract from ongoing Epstein leaks and DOJ battles.
Media and Public Response
Commentators on thefive) and podcasts by jessewatters) and greggutfeld) debated whether political figures should ever overrule scientists.
Social media hashtags like #SharpiegateReturns and #NOAAFirings trended overnight.
Market Impact
While the scandal had limited direct effect on market) indices, analysts warn political interference can shake investor confidence in disaster forecasts and economic planning.
Why Sharpiegate Matters Again
The controversy centers on a 2019 incident where Trump displayed a hurricane map seemingly altered with a black marker to include Alabama in Dorian’s path.
At the time, NOAA issued an unusual statement supporting Trump — which the leaked memos now show was driven by direct White House pressure.
Broader Implications
-
Renewed scrutiny of government scientific integrity.
-
Possible hearings by Congress into NOAA’s independence.
-
Calls from both left and right to shield science agencies from politics.
Experts Warn of Lasting Damage
Environmental policy analysts say the scandal erodes trust in vital agencies predicting hurricanes, floods, and climate threats.
This comes as the federalreserve) warns of economic risks from climate disasters.
The firing of top NOAA officials brings “Sharpiegate” back into the spotlight, reminding the country of how even weather forecasts became politically charged.
Whether these firings bring closure or deepen the controversy remains to be seen.
